Rumor – The World Economic Forum has requested a ban on private food cultivation to reduce CO₂ emissions.
Analysis
A message circulating on social media alleges that the World Economic Forum (WEF) has asked governments worldwide to ban private food cultivation. According to these messages, this measure is supposedly part of a plan to reduce CO₂ emissions and achieve the “net zero” goal by 2030.
The viral posts also mention a study from the University of Michigan, allegedly funded by the WEF, claiming that urban gardens and homegrown vegetables have a greater environmental impact than industrial agriculture. The content further alleges that the proposal is linked to “food restrictions” and “population control through vaccines.” Check out excerpts from the circulating text:
Global ban on homegrown food to achieve ‘net zero’ The World Economic Forum (WEF) is calling on governments worldwide to ban private food cultivation to supposedly reduce CO₂ emissions. According to the WEF, homegrown food contributes to climate change, and this ban should help meet net zero goals by 2030.
Scientists at the University of Michigan, funded by the WEF, published this study in the journal Nature Cities. The latest WEF study claims that the “carbon footprint” of urban gardens and private vegetable cultivation has a greater impact on the planet than industrial agriculture. Researchers from the University of Michigan published these findings in Nature Cities, discovering that a portion of produce from urban gardens generates up to five times more CO₂ than conventional agriculture. […]
While critics argue that these demands restrict people’s self-sufficiency, the WEF is maintaining its net zero plans. In the U.S., 14 major cities have pledged to ban meat, dairy, and private vehicles by 2030. […]
At the same time, the WEF is also advancing its ongoing mass vaccination agenda. At the Davos summit in January, members discussed bi-annual mRNA vaccines as part of precision medicine. Plans include “long-acting injectables” and “climate-sensitive vaccines” to combat various diseases. The WEF’s growing influence over governments is becoming increasingly evident. Critics warn that these measures are less about protecting the climate and more about controlling the population.
Fact-Check
Alarmist content like this is a goldmine for conspiracy theorists, who overlook one “small detail”: it’s all complete nonsense. Let’s analyze the following questions: 1) Did the World Economic Forum ban private food cultivation to reduce CO₂? 2) Does private food cultivation contribute to CO₂ emissions? 3) What are other similar fake news stories involving the World Economic Forum?
Did the World Economic Forum ban private food cultivation to reduce CO₂?
No, the World Economic Forum has not proposed banning private food cultivation. The viral content spreads false information, linking the WEF to a study published in the journal Nature Cities. However, the study’s co-author, Benjamin Goldstein of the University of Michigan, clarified in an interview with AFP that “there is no recommendation to ban urban agriculture or home cultivation.” Additionally, the study has no connection to the World Economic Forum.
The cited research actually analyzed the carbon footprint of different forms of urban agriculture in countries like the United States and Europe.
Does private food cultivation contribute to CO₂ emissions?
Yes, but at levels that do not justify a ban. The study published by the University of Michigan indicates that urban agriculture can have a larger carbon footprint under certain conditions, mainly due to infrastructure use (raised beds, composting, and synthetic materials). However, the study suggests improving efficiency and promoting more sustainable practices, not banning home cultivation.
What are other similar fake news stories involving the World Economic Forum?
The World Economic Forum is frequently targeted by conspiracy theories that distort its statements. Other debunked fake news stories include the false claim that the WEF hired “unvaccinated pilots” to fly to Davos, the hoax that the WEF declared “pedophiles will save humanity”, and the false allegation that a filmmaker insulted globalists during a WEF meeting in Davos.
Conclusion
The claim that the World Economic Forum has requested a ban on private food cultivation to reduce CO₂ emissions is false. The study cited in the viral messages has no connection to the WEF, and its authors emphasize that the research aims to improve the sustainability of urban agriculture, not prohibit this type of cultivation.
Fake news ❌
Ps: This article was suggested by readers of Boatos.org. If you’d like to suggest a topic to Boatos.org, contact us via email at [email protected] or WhatsApp (link here: https://wa.me/556192755610).